|
Beginning
1
|
Developing
2
|
Accomplished
3
|
Exemplary
4
|
Score
|
|
Victim/survivor
|
The victim/survivor
is not believable. The behavior is not appropriate for an interview
session. Most of the criteria has not been met.
|
The victim/survivor
is almost believable but it is obvious that there has not been much practice.
He has not met his criteria of knowledge.
|
The victim/survivor
is believable. His facts are based on knowledge of victims from the
war. He has practiced and implemented at least the required criteria.
|
The victim/survivor
is compassionate and believable. His facts are based on knowledge
of victims from the war. He has practiced and implemented more than
the required criteria
|
|
|
Journalist
|
Most of your question
are lower level questions. You have not met much of the criteria
of knowledge of your subject.
|
Some of your questions
are on the high end of Blooms Taxonomy but you focus still on knowledge
questions. You have not met all of the criteria of knowledge.
|
The majority of your
questions are analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. You have hit all of
the facts that you were asked to obtain. Your questions are in logical
order.
|
The majority of your
questions are analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. You have prepared
the questions and hit all the criteria of facts and then some. Your
questions are in logical order.
|
|
|
Pictures
|
You only have a few
pictures that are not relevant to your questions. They don't evoke
much emotion from the interviewee.
|
You have a few photographs
that go with your interview. They evoke some emotion from the audience
and the interviewee.
|
You have enough pictures
and use them as a tool in your questioning. Your interviewee and
audience react to the the pictures emotionally.
|
You have used pictures
expertly. You have used them at strategic points in your presentation
to complement the questions of knowledge that you ask.
|
|
|
Presentation
|
You have not practiced
working together and it shows because you have trouble with the flow of
your interview.
|
You are not believable
as the characters you portray throughout the entire interview. You
could have used more practice to make the presentation more smooth.
|
You respond adequately
to each other. You have shown care and practice in your presentation.
|
You have practiced the
presentation and taken care to respond well to each other. You are
believable in the characters you portray.
|
|
insight
(overall)
|
You have not used your
time to the fullest and examined your roles to ask insightful questions.
|
You have asked some
insightful questions to make your roles believable to the audience, but
you fall short on the audience understanding what you went through.
|
Your questions are insightful
and your audience relates to your characters that you portray.
|
Your questions and answers
are insightful and interesting. You have taken the time to get to
know your role and ask relevant and insightful questions. The audience
is glued to your presentation
|
|
